How dare they

It will be worth remembering that when all the lurid details of their expenses fiddles came out our MPs did not do the honorable thing and clean up their act.

No - they declared the publication of their nest feathering a possible breach of the Official Secrets Act and decided to hunt down the source to punish THEM.

They think that their fiddling and stealing of public money should be covered by the Official Secrets Act? I now fully support this campaign from the Daily Mash.

Our political overlords need to be very careful here. They have looted the public purse while ordinary Subjects suffer through their horrific mis-management of our economy for the last 12 years, destroying pensions and putting our children's children in the frame for £350bn of debt.

Piano wire. That is looking like a bloody good option right now.

YouTube Politics FAIL

From the Welsh Left:





From the Right over the pond:





I know who comes off better for comment, production values and entertainment!

Mutual Admiration Society silent today

It is interesting that through all of this Brown-induced downturn his apologists have tried to claim that after 30 years of success the current crisis is because of Thatcherite policies after all. Specifically that the conversion of building societies into banks caused them to be exposed to bad risks that mutuals would have just avoided.

Then the Dunfermline collapsed at the weekend and it turned out that it did so because the management made bad decisions and were allowed to do so because of a fundamental lack of oversight from the Brown created FSA.

So it turns out that pre-Thatcher building societies are just as vulnerable to Brown’s bungled management of the economy and that they were just spouting horsehit after all. But we all knew that.

Congratulations

To the fighting Tommy Harry Allingham who has become the UK's oldest man.

Comment Moderation

Sorry. I did not realise that I had comment moderation on. It is not my policy to stop comments so I amm turning moderation off.

When the Sista drives you to self abuse

Fuck sake. I mean....fuck sake.

I don't want you to get the wrong idea - I can fully understand that anyone married to our Home Secretary would need to crack one out manually but there are ways of doing it without getting caught. Plus I love the idea that her feminist tendencies has driven him to taking himself in hand and objectifying vulnerable women in order to get some satisfaction.

If you are going to get the state to pay for having a wank then the least you can do is use the internet connection to download some good old fashioned yank girls taking it up the tradesman or maybe some romantic dogging pictures. What you don't do is buy them on the itemised Virgin bill.

Also what has not been covered in the MSM (thank god for blogs eh?) is that Virgin pay-per-view grumble is really fucking dire. The fact that he was so desperate to feel like a man that he turned to total crap softcore porn should humiliate Ms Smith. Her harpy tendencies has forced her husband into the most degrading position - wanking in the house to some of the most untitilating movies ever produced. The Ann Summers catalog is better.

PS: As I have said over at LabourList just there there was a campain to send each MP a copy of 1984 a couple of months ago. It came with a note saying "this is not an instruction manual" and had the concept of state-provided pornography. Obvisouly he got the copy of the book but the wife did not pass on the warning note.

Labour to enrich themselves further at our expense.

A new probe is going to begin into the expense claims that MPs make following yet more corruption and fraud exposed in our political masters.

Let us be very clear on this. If you or I were to be caught fiddling our expenses at work we would probably be dismissed for gross misconduct. After all, the expenses are paid out of company funds and that directly affects the bottom line. If you defraud your employer you make it difficult for them to turn a profit and therefore pay their wage bill. You can endanger the company.

And even if you did not endanger the company there is also the question of trust. If the company cannot trust you they cannot employ you. You become twice as expensive as someone has to constantly check your work. You become a liability and your bosses become suspicious. You are the one with the severe character flaws.

Now. If your elected representative is caught on the fiddle what should happen? They should be dismissed, barred from holding public office and an election called. What does actually happen? He or she makes laws. They have to have the country’s best interests at heart yet they are caught cheating. But here is the crux. If they are caught cheating they are in a position to change the rules so that what they have always done ILLEGALLY will now be acceptable. And it looks likely that this is what they will do. Publication of recent expenses claims have been passed off as things they have not benefited from. To them putting their TV licence payments on expenses is not something they benefit directly from because the money does not accumulate in their bank accounts. But they are wrong.

We as subjects of the crown have to pay for such things as non business taxi fares, TV licence and council tax out of post taxation income. When you get to put a couple of hundred on expenses then that is money you do not need to take from your pay. So you are immediately better off for it.

So how to avoid getting caught? Most of us would conclude the best way would not to do it in the first place. But not our political betters. Their solution is to change the rules. My MP spoke for and voted for £24,000 tax free lump sum every year so he did not have to submit receipts. I am sure the wretchedly poor constituents in his area would be delighted to know this man (who already receives a £60,000+ basic salary) voted for the equivalent of a second wage equal to about £34,000 before tax. This for the equivalent of a 3.5 working day and before a gold plated un-funded pension. In fairness he does supports a minimum wage but we must assume he feels that he cannot live on it!

By voting for this lump sum he never again has to justify why he claimed this or that sundry household expense against the general taxation used to fund his expenses. He has simply thrown a veil over the whole affair and made himself unaccountable.

Remember – every time they claim something on expenses that you or I would have to buy ourselves they are enriching themselves at our expense. Every time one of them is caught cheating the expenses rules they are taking from the money we pay in tax at a time when this collection of useless fuckers runs our country into the ground. While the IMF get ready to bail out the UK, as the Bank of England follows the Zimbabwe model of printing money they are feathering their own nests and setting themselves up for life. When they buy a plasma telly on the company while thousands are laid off they are destroying the country.

Their actions are those of traitors. In a time of unparalleled financial trouble largely brought about because of the Labour Party we have elected representatives putting themselves first. The law of the land has some quite acceptable punishments for traitors. So if you will excuse me I am off to invest in piano wire stocks before they change that law as well.

I knew this

Is it just me or is this how most of us think Feminists look?



I for one would consider it news if someone like this wore that t-shirt.

Feminists are ugly

Labour are about to persecute individuals for electoral gain. Nice.

Larry Flint once commented of the US Constitution that “if it protects me then you know it will protect you”. (Paraphrased)

Such is the privilege that our brethren enjoy under their “more perfect union”.

Here we have a governing party made up of slackjaws who are careening from one crisis to another and pour vile knee-jerk reactions from every pronouncement. It is like a collection of infants and the mentally retarded try to complete the crossword from the Sun. The retards are frustrated because they don’t understand why it is not finished, know it should be simple but lack the self-awareness to realise they are retards and the children just want to satisfy their base urges by pissing and shitting everywhere and not caring what happens.

After the one-eyed snot-gobbling mentalist fuckmonkey Gordon Brown was politely reminded that while he may be the unelected Head of our pathetic excuse for a government we still have the slightly pesky problem of not being a total fucking dictatorship he had to come up with something. So when he started spouting off his ignorant bullshit about basically stealing the legally held pension of Fred Goodwin in the hope of scoring some cheap love from a UK populace who frequently have wet dreams about him being tom, very slowly, limb from limb by a pack of rabid Chihuahuas he was told that he could not just do that because he was nominally in charge at the moment. You could imagine him shaking his tiny green slime covered fist in impotent rage.

So what happens? The same thing as what always happens when these petty dickheads are thwarted in their attempt to make themselves popular. Harriot the Harpy goes on the telly to announce that if the law has frustrated their attempts at illiberal, dictator-like thievery then the law has to change. They are actually suggesting that they introduce a law to specifically remove the legal property of an individually named person and to make it retrospective.

The British Crown did less to inspire Larry’s forefathers to form their United States in the first place.

Think about this for a minute. What this means is that this lot are willing to pass legislation to give themselves powers that will allow them to remove legal property from anyone who they think may be sufficiently hated by the people to swing a few votes their way. And more worrying is that while the head of LTSB and HBOS have fared little better than Goodwin they are not being hounded because it suited the Government to spin this story to hush up the Bank of England criticising the way that the head-case Brown has speak tackled this country into the dirt.

They created this row and now they are proposing to “end” it by passing a bill to persecute a single subject of the Crown.

And what is more distressing is that the party who claims to stick up for the rights of the individuals are joining in with this shit. Had the Tories been sharper at this the narrative would have been that Brown is inescapably at the head of this crisis and that he is the one that has brought us here. But instead they are bleating about CCTV cameras being paid for by the bank. Tory MPs should be setting fire to themselves in the chamber to protest at the abuse of power by this fantasist bunch of student politicians who have been out of their depth since 1997 and who now should be forced to go to prison for their crimes against the country. But instead they let them away with it again and again.

Having said that I know a piece of legislation that they could pass that would make them very popular and allow them to claim legitimacy in government.

We need a law that says the Queen should call the entire PLP to the Palace. There she informs each one at a time that if he or she makes it to Admiralty Arch at the end of the Mall they may stay in Government. She then has the guard release them one at a time.

Lining the route will be a crowd selected from the populace armed with bats, stones, half-bricks and belts. Any Labour MP making it to Prescott’s grace-and-favour apartment on foot and lives has clearly earned the right to govern.

Note: I am aware that the larceny conducted by the PLP means that some have a standard of living such that they would expire running from the gate to Victoria’s statue but that just means those at the end of the Mall will have the pleasure of the real fighters to dispatch. Like Darwinism for thieving bastard politicians.

The rise and fall of LabourList

No one can doubt that the excruciating effort that is LabourList has been a welcome distraction to the veteran blog reader.

One of the first posts I remember reading on that site concerned itself with the idea that the “tories did not get the web” and did not know how to use new technology.

There was no basis for this claim. It was a straw man. Essentially Draper and crew attempted to retread the idea that those on the right are stuffy and out of touch. They all have blue rinses so could not possibly work out how to use the web. Their assumptions had to doublethink to survive. Tories did not get the net but LabourList exists as an attempt to regain the blog from the Right, from Ian Dale and Guido. From this rather pathetic start only good things were bound to flow.

Lets be honest. Draper was given a very simple order by Downing Street. Get Guido.

The order-order.com website is a phenomenon. It has scalped two government ministers and is currently pursuing the Home Secretary. It is this activity that the Brown government wants to shut down because it hates the scrutiny. That and the fact he has successfully introduced the job title of Prime Mentalist into the British political phrase book.

Draper was to deploy a counterbalance to Guido et al. He was to send into battle a group of heavyweight writers who would forever change the way the internet voted. The only problem was that when you control the dead tree press you control the debate. When you step into our back yard anyone with a blog has right of reply. And when the great fisker bloggers like Devils Kitchen get involved you are going to be destroyed.

Don’t get me wrong. The plan was sound. Just the execution was complete fucking horseshit. It reminded me of Sean Connery in The Untouchables. Draper brought the knife.

When I think of this situation I think of it like the old sea battles of old. Guido sails around the Westminster blogosphere in a mighty battleship. He has identified a product, a customer and a style and has spent years building a brand, getting name recognition and becoming an armour plated large calibre force.

Draper launched a 10 ft wooden dingy, called it HMS Dreadnought and was crushed in the ensuing [brief] battle.

Like a Ritalin deprived ADHD sufferer Derek had not laid the foundations because he could not wait. He had not built up the loyal, partisan following. He instead launched a small website, put the Labour brand on it and expected instant status and standing because of it. Then when he has the tiniest advantage to exploit he makes the classic leftist mistake. He thinks the rules only apply to others.

We have all been there. You get into an argument with a leftie and when they know they are losing they start building the straw men. “all you fascists hate faggots” I have heard before. When challenged apparently these bastions of equal opportunities claim that they use this kind of language because it “shocks” us and is to confront our prejudices. They use the self same offensive language they they claim the other lot do. Projectionism while they destroy the village to save the village.

So it was thus that Draper, while attacking Guido for not removing 5 remarks that he himself had judged racist (and to devalue his opinion about 10 that were clearly not racist but were clutching at straws trying to build a narrative) he managed to call the Guido fanbase “window lickers”.

When called on this stupid use of language the trained 40 year old clinical psychotherapist claims never to have heard the term used as abusive to those with Downs. Indeed he claimed he thought that it related to kids who “licked the window of a sweet shop” because of course everyone knows that the windows of a sweet shop taste of KitKat.

When faced with a situation he could not control, orchestrated by individuals who are immune to his bully boy rhetoric he resorted to base insults and made him the laughing stock.

It is Draper that does not get the internet. It is he who is playing by someone lses rules and trying to change them to his own. But he will fail. And while he does it gives us an excuse to constantly post pictures of the woman who inexplicably chose him as a mate.

Spawn spawns and sells story

It is well known in economic circles that if you subsidise something then you get more of it. The best example is the world famous butter mountains that the EU periodically spawn.

In the past the EU farming subsidies paid mainly to the French have distorted the markets so that we in the EU pay “cheaper” prices for EU produce, squeezing other producers out of the market. Of course these things are not cheaper – we already pay for the product once through EU contributions that are then redistributed as farming subsidies but the fact is we subsidise wheat, corn, milk or anything else and we get more of it.

Indeed the reverse is also true. In the perverted world of the EU you are subsidised to let your fields go fallow (thereby increasing your “production” of nothing) in order to compensate for when the first lot of subsidies produce too much. It is of course impossible for the EU simply to cut subsidies on actual production as this causes the French farmers to take to the streets and burn goats in front of Parisian branches of McDonalds.

And this theory holds true for one of the greatest “unspeakable” truths in the UK today.

Say it quietly for you don’t want to get the professional victims blood up. But if you subsidise having children then you will produce more children.

First up I should explain that this is a theme that I am expanding on from the First Lady of conservative politics Ann Coulter. A number of months ago she wrote (much better than I) about the effects of child benefit in the US (cannot find the link at the moment). She drew a link between the ever rising child benefits available and the ever rising birth rates particularly into fatherless, incomeless “poverty families”. And she noted that when Bush cut child benefit the birth rate into these demographics dropped. If you subsidise something you get more of it, if you cut subsidies you get less of it.

The ever thought provoking Trixy is pointing out that the politicians are taking our tax money away from our own families to give it to people in reward for having babies. The case of the alleged 13-year-old father in the news at the tail end of last week appears to be transforming into a one stop shop for confirming everything you ever suspected about the cattle subsidies we give to the subclass of humanity festering in the sink estates of this country.

Simple fact is that we are now at a point in time where we are making dubious heroes out of these children having babies. Alfie says he will be a good parent but I would agree with Trixy that he does not have the skills or experience to even comprehend what that means or entails.

Alfie himself sprang from the loins of a feckless whoremonger who has sired 9 children by different women, Alfie’s babymama may actually be the local bike who has slept with other local boys who now appear very keen to be saddled with a baby that has appeared on the front page of The Sun and all this is played out in such a way as to somehow glamorise the appalling situation that they have gotten themselves into.

The families of the two children, who have managed to somehow produce the generation that will pay for Jeremy Kyle’s girls to go to private school, are not upset that their babies are having babies but that the taxpayer funded Social Services department are living up to their expectations on the level of service. Their reaction has been that they feel their expected level of entitlement has not been fulfilled.

We have subsidised these people to reproduce like human cattle. And their first reaction to a physical manifestation of statutory rape was not to hunt down the boy that defiled their daughter and kill him in the most horrific manner possible. No, it was to immediate cry that the government is not giving them enough free money.

Here is a thought. Go out and earn money in a job. Can’t get a job before you turn 16? Should have thought about that before you chucked your muck up inside the Estate Entertainment Centre.

If the next Tory government wants to do something about these parasites then the first thing it should do is scrap the child benefits and incorporate it back into a child element of personal tax allowance. That way only those earning an actual wage will “benefit” and even then it will be by keeping more of your own money.

I don't get it?

This link to a BBC article on the "horror" of Jeremy Clarkson.

But Gordon Brown is Scottish.

He DOES only have one eye.

And he is more than an idiot, he is a grade A mentalist who claims to have foreseen the current problem but declined to do anything about it while saying he has saved the world and that we will see growth by Christmas despite just calling what we are in a depression.

So I fail to see how anyone could find any of what Jeremy said to be inaccurate.

Oh wait. My mistake. The bastion if impartiality that is the BBC only sought comment on the remark from Labour politicians.

Why is there an SSPCA?

I have never understood this.

The Scottish SPCA is picking a fight with the Royal SPCA over who should donate. The SSPCA says that Scots should not donate to the RSPCA because they don't have a Scottish remit.

So my thought is why have an SSPCA? Why is there two almost identically named charities with the same goals serving different geographical areas? It seems to me that this is duplication of effort. Why pay the money for similar command structures? Surely this is duplicating expense and that is money not being spent on sick donkeys?

Can you go a chicken supper?

Shit stained, murdering, terrorist scumbag.

Dead, shit stained, murdering, terrorist scumbag.

There. No need to see this movie. You know everything you need to know.

Ethnocentric Conservatism

Much has been made of the election of Obama. Needless to say I am not partaking of the kool-aid. I will detail why it is obvious to anyone with an impartial mind why he was not a suitable candidate at a later time.

In the meantime I urge you to bookmark this link. He is a fresh voice against those who revel in victimhood on the American Left.

And more power to him. So to speak.

Enough to make me want to cut up my Executive Club card

Left Wing Racism

It has always been a persistent lie that racist politics has been the preserve of the right in politics.

If you ever talk to someone identifying themselves with right-of-centre politics then you usually hear "I don't care as long as you work/pay tax/keep the lawn tidy". Those on the right don't really care about race. We accept all as long as they are good neighbours and pay their way in the world.

On the Left they are all about race. Identity is the centre of their politics. Favouring or promoting special interest groups is pretty much their core operations. They need the minority ethnics or sexual orientation groups to go into bat when their ill thought out emotionally driven policies need pushed. Who would argue with the poorly paid worker? Or the lesbian outreach councillor? Anyone who does is labeled a reactionary/racist or worse. They are an effective way of shutting down debate when your arguments or policies are dangerous or unpopular. Kind of why for 8 years Bush=Hitler.

So it was with some satisfaction that I am watching footage of Unite union officials stand up and call for "British Jobs for British Workers" (readers may recall unions denouncing Brown for using that phrase last year as the language of the BNP*).

Of course what the unions are not happy about is that these Johnny Foreigners are non-union, they don't pay any dues and they threaten their power base. But all we can see on the telly is the champions of left wing politics telling people that those with a funny accent are unwelcome and dangerous.

Savour the irony and remember that the next time anyone tries to tell you that left wingers are a tolerant bunch.

*Anyone who has ever read the really shitty document that is the BNP election manifesto will know that their politics are of increased public spending, increased taxation and increased state powers. Everything the Labour movement stands for. The only thing that they differ on is their open xenophobia.

Hello

Wow, look. I have a blog.

My worthless ill-informed opinions are now on the net. I have an undeserved sense of importance.

Cool.