How dare they

It will be worth remembering that when all the lurid details of their expenses fiddles came out our MPs did not do the honorable thing and clean up their act.

No - they declared the publication of their nest feathering a possible breach of the Official Secrets Act and decided to hunt down the source to punish THEM.

They think that their fiddling and stealing of public money should be covered by the Official Secrets Act? I now fully support this campaign from the Daily Mash.

Our political overlords need to be very careful here. They have looted the public purse while ordinary Subjects suffer through their horrific mis-management of our economy for the last 12 years, destroying pensions and putting our children's children in the frame for £350bn of debt.

Piano wire. That is looking like a bloody good option right now.

Mutual Admiration Society silent today

It is interesting that through all of this Brown-induced downturn his apologists have tried to claim that after 30 years of success the current crisis is because of Thatcherite policies after all. Specifically that the conversion of building societies into banks caused them to be exposed to bad risks that mutuals would have just avoided.

Then the Dunfermline collapsed at the weekend and it turned out that it did so because the management made bad decisions and were allowed to do so because of a fundamental lack of oversight from the Brown created FSA.

So it turns out that pre-Thatcher building societies are just as vulnerable to Brown’s bungled management of the economy and that they were just spouting horsehit after all. But we all knew that.

Labour to enrich themselves further at our expense.

A new probe is going to begin into the expense claims that MPs make following yet more corruption and fraud exposed in our political masters.

Let us be very clear on this. If you or I were to be caught fiddling our expenses at work we would probably be dismissed for gross misconduct. After all, the expenses are paid out of company funds and that directly affects the bottom line. If you defraud your employer you make it difficult for them to turn a profit and therefore pay their wage bill. You can endanger the company.

And even if you did not endanger the company there is also the question of trust. If the company cannot trust you they cannot employ you. You become twice as expensive as someone has to constantly check your work. You become a liability and your bosses become suspicious. You are the one with the severe character flaws.

Now. If your elected representative is caught on the fiddle what should happen? They should be dismissed, barred from holding public office and an election called. What does actually happen? He or she makes laws. They have to have the country’s best interests at heart yet they are caught cheating. But here is the crux. If they are caught cheating they are in a position to change the rules so that what they have always done ILLEGALLY will now be acceptable. And it looks likely that this is what they will do. Publication of recent expenses claims have been passed off as things they have not benefited from. To them putting their TV licence payments on expenses is not something they benefit directly from because the money does not accumulate in their bank accounts. But they are wrong.

We as subjects of the crown have to pay for such things as non business taxi fares, TV licence and council tax out of post taxation income. When you get to put a couple of hundred on expenses then that is money you do not need to take from your pay. So you are immediately better off for it.

So how to avoid getting caught? Most of us would conclude the best way would not to do it in the first place. But not our political betters. Their solution is to change the rules. My MP spoke for and voted for £24,000 tax free lump sum every year so he did not have to submit receipts. I am sure the wretchedly poor constituents in his area would be delighted to know this man (who already receives a £60,000+ basic salary) voted for the equivalent of a second wage equal to about £34,000 before tax. This for the equivalent of a 3.5 working day and before a gold plated un-funded pension. In fairness he does supports a minimum wage but we must assume he feels that he cannot live on it!

By voting for this lump sum he never again has to justify why he claimed this or that sundry household expense against the general taxation used to fund his expenses. He has simply thrown a veil over the whole affair and made himself unaccountable.

Remember – every time they claim something on expenses that you or I would have to buy ourselves they are enriching themselves at our expense. Every time one of them is caught cheating the expenses rules they are taking from the money we pay in tax at a time when this collection of useless fuckers runs our country into the ground. While the IMF get ready to bail out the UK, as the Bank of England follows the Zimbabwe model of printing money they are feathering their own nests and setting themselves up for life. When they buy a plasma telly on the company while thousands are laid off they are destroying the country.

Their actions are those of traitors. In a time of unparalleled financial trouble largely brought about because of the Labour Party we have elected representatives putting themselves first. The law of the land has some quite acceptable punishments for traitors. So if you will excuse me I am off to invest in piano wire stocks before they change that law as well.

Labour are about to persecute individuals for electoral gain. Nice.

Larry Flint once commented of the US Constitution that “if it protects me then you know it will protect you”. (Paraphrased)

Such is the privilege that our brethren enjoy under their “more perfect union”.

Here we have a governing party made up of slackjaws who are careening from one crisis to another and pour vile knee-jerk reactions from every pronouncement. It is like a collection of infants and the mentally retarded try to complete the crossword from the Sun. The retards are frustrated because they don’t understand why it is not finished, know it should be simple but lack the self-awareness to realise they are retards and the children just want to satisfy their base urges by pissing and shitting everywhere and not caring what happens.

After the one-eyed snot-gobbling mentalist fuckmonkey Gordon Brown was politely reminded that while he may be the unelected Head of our pathetic excuse for a government we still have the slightly pesky problem of not being a total fucking dictatorship he had to come up with something. So when he started spouting off his ignorant bullshit about basically stealing the legally held pension of Fred Goodwin in the hope of scoring some cheap love from a UK populace who frequently have wet dreams about him being tom, very slowly, limb from limb by a pack of rabid Chihuahuas he was told that he could not just do that because he was nominally in charge at the moment. You could imagine him shaking his tiny green slime covered fist in impotent rage.

So what happens? The same thing as what always happens when these petty dickheads are thwarted in their attempt to make themselves popular. Harriot the Harpy goes on the telly to announce that if the law has frustrated their attempts at illiberal, dictator-like thievery then the law has to change. They are actually suggesting that they introduce a law to specifically remove the legal property of an individually named person and to make it retrospective.

The British Crown did less to inspire Larry’s forefathers to form their United States in the first place.

Think about this for a minute. What this means is that this lot are willing to pass legislation to give themselves powers that will allow them to remove legal property from anyone who they think may be sufficiently hated by the people to swing a few votes their way. And more worrying is that while the head of LTSB and HBOS have fared little better than Goodwin they are not being hounded because it suited the Government to spin this story to hush up the Bank of England criticising the way that the head-case Brown has speak tackled this country into the dirt.

They created this row and now they are proposing to “end” it by passing a bill to persecute a single subject of the Crown.

And what is more distressing is that the party who claims to stick up for the rights of the individuals are joining in with this shit. Had the Tories been sharper at this the narrative would have been that Brown is inescapably at the head of this crisis and that he is the one that has brought us here. But instead they are bleating about CCTV cameras being paid for by the bank. Tory MPs should be setting fire to themselves in the chamber to protest at the abuse of power by this fantasist bunch of student politicians who have been out of their depth since 1997 and who now should be forced to go to prison for their crimes against the country. But instead they let them away with it again and again.

Having said that I know a piece of legislation that they could pass that would make them very popular and allow them to claim legitimacy in government.

We need a law that says the Queen should call the entire PLP to the Palace. There she informs each one at a time that if he or she makes it to Admiralty Arch at the end of the Mall they may stay in Government. She then has the guard release them one at a time.

Lining the route will be a crowd selected from the populace armed with bats, stones, half-bricks and belts. Any Labour MP making it to Prescott’s grace-and-favour apartment on foot and lives has clearly earned the right to govern.

Note: I am aware that the larceny conducted by the PLP means that some have a standard of living such that they would expire running from the gate to Victoria’s statue but that just means those at the end of the Mall will have the pleasure of the real fighters to dispatch. Like Darwinism for thieving bastard politicians.

Spawn spawns and sells story

It is well known in economic circles that if you subsidise something then you get more of it. The best example is the world famous butter mountains that the EU periodically spawn.

In the past the EU farming subsidies paid mainly to the French have distorted the markets so that we in the EU pay “cheaper” prices for EU produce, squeezing other producers out of the market. Of course these things are not cheaper – we already pay for the product once through EU contributions that are then redistributed as farming subsidies but the fact is we subsidise wheat, corn, milk or anything else and we get more of it.

Indeed the reverse is also true. In the perverted world of the EU you are subsidised to let your fields go fallow (thereby increasing your “production” of nothing) in order to compensate for when the first lot of subsidies produce too much. It is of course impossible for the EU simply to cut subsidies on actual production as this causes the French farmers to take to the streets and burn goats in front of Parisian branches of McDonalds.

And this theory holds true for one of the greatest “unspeakable” truths in the UK today.

Say it quietly for you don’t want to get the professional victims blood up. But if you subsidise having children then you will produce more children.

First up I should explain that this is a theme that I am expanding on from the First Lady of conservative politics Ann Coulter. A number of months ago she wrote (much better than I) about the effects of child benefit in the US (cannot find the link at the moment). She drew a link between the ever rising child benefits available and the ever rising birth rates particularly into fatherless, incomeless “poverty families”. And she noted that when Bush cut child benefit the birth rate into these demographics dropped. If you subsidise something you get more of it, if you cut subsidies you get less of it.

The ever thought provoking Trixy is pointing out that the politicians are taking our tax money away from our own families to give it to people in reward for having babies. The case of the alleged 13-year-old father in the news at the tail end of last week appears to be transforming into a one stop shop for confirming everything you ever suspected about the cattle subsidies we give to the subclass of humanity festering in the sink estates of this country.

Simple fact is that we are now at a point in time where we are making dubious heroes out of these children having babies. Alfie says he will be a good parent but I would agree with Trixy that he does not have the skills or experience to even comprehend what that means or entails.

Alfie himself sprang from the loins of a feckless whoremonger who has sired 9 children by different women, Alfie’s babymama may actually be the local bike who has slept with other local boys who now appear very keen to be saddled with a baby that has appeared on the front page of The Sun and all this is played out in such a way as to somehow glamorise the appalling situation that they have gotten themselves into.

The families of the two children, who have managed to somehow produce the generation that will pay for Jeremy Kyle’s girls to go to private school, are not upset that their babies are having babies but that the taxpayer funded Social Services department are living up to their expectations on the level of service. Their reaction has been that they feel their expected level of entitlement has not been fulfilled.

We have subsidised these people to reproduce like human cattle. And their first reaction to a physical manifestation of statutory rape was not to hunt down the boy that defiled their daughter and kill him in the most horrific manner possible. No, it was to immediate cry that the government is not giving them enough free money.

Here is a thought. Go out and earn money in a job. Can’t get a job before you turn 16? Should have thought about that before you chucked your muck up inside the Estate Entertainment Centre.

If the next Tory government wants to do something about these parasites then the first thing it should do is scrap the child benefits and incorporate it back into a child element of personal tax allowance. That way only those earning an actual wage will “benefit” and even then it will be by keeping more of your own money.